History Bits Why The Ottomans Never Used Full Plate Armour
History Bits Why The Ottoman S Never Used Full Plate Armour Youtube In the quick history bits series, we'll have quick casual discussions on topics that don't need a full in depth video. The ottoman's developed a fighting style in which full plate armour was unnecessary and inconvenient. probably middle eastern culture traditions. you know, the deserts are bone piercing hot, you can't do that with their hit and run, and the future pew pew your enemies with iron balls. i have never seen a painting of ottomans with full plate,its.
Evolution Of Arms And Armors Writingpromptsaccy. • 7 yr. ago. no, to the extent of my knowledge, fully enclosing articulated plate armor was only ever manufactured and used in europe. fully enclosing plate armor was the result of centuries of technological advancements that were unique to europe. while the armor of other civilizations did develop over time, they did so. In europe, plate armour is introduced in a rudimentary form (a coat of plates for the body) in the 13th century. supplemental defenseses for the limbs are also added in the 13th and early 14th centuries. it is in the later 14th century that full plate armour an exoskeleton of metal plates, articulated together to allow for movement is. Name: “pot lid” armor. dated to the sixteenth century. made of steel plate mail with steel chain mail. a later design in turkish armor retains the chain mail suit but uses larger plates of steel to cover the torso. the largest plate is 10 12 inch diameter disc in the front and back, known commonly as “pot lids.”. Nov 16, 2019. #5. dan howard said: this armour never existed. the byzantines never used rivets in their lamellar. the "dots" you see in illustrations are embossed domes or small patches of lacing, not rivets. the answer to the op is "muntions plate". good quality ore, blast furnaces, and trip hammer mills enabled plate armour to be produced.
Ottoman Armor Leon Furniture Name: “pot lid” armor. dated to the sixteenth century. made of steel plate mail with steel chain mail. a later design in turkish armor retains the chain mail suit but uses larger plates of steel to cover the torso. the largest plate is 10 12 inch diameter disc in the front and back, known commonly as “pot lids.”. Nov 16, 2019. #5. dan howard said: this armour never existed. the byzantines never used rivets in their lamellar. the "dots" you see in illustrations are embossed domes or small patches of lacing, not rivets. the answer to the op is "muntions plate". good quality ore, blast furnaces, and trip hammer mills enabled plate armour to be produced. Dan howard said: full plate armour was still being worn during the english civil war. look up hasselridge's "london lobsters". the english civil war armor.only reached to the knees. if you are talking about a full suit of armor from head to toe, i believe in would be sometime in the 1500's was the last time a complete set of head to toe armor. A. plate armour's comfort was only true in the case of full plate armour, but it didn't reach that point until it's final stages, most early plate armour were just singular pieces attached at the chest or joints, those are not going to be more comfortable than lamellar or maile, in fact they're most likely to be much worse. b.
Medieval Plate Armor Guide 1100 1560 R Coolguides Dan howard said: full plate armour was still being worn during the english civil war. look up hasselridge's "london lobsters". the english civil war armor.only reached to the knees. if you are talking about a full suit of armor from head to toe, i believe in would be sometime in the 1500's was the last time a complete set of head to toe armor. A. plate armour's comfort was only true in the case of full plate armour, but it didn't reach that point until it's final stages, most early plate armour were just singular pieces attached at the chest or joints, those are not going to be more comfortable than lamellar or maile, in fact they're most likely to be much worse. b.
Comments are closed.